“Where Being Conservative Means You'll Need To Keep It Secret.”

Browse > Home / Archive: June 2009

Give. Give Until It Hurts.

June 11th, 2009 | 4 Comments | Posted in activists

Sunrise in Afghanistan
Creative Commons License photo credit: Army.mil

Now that they’ve given Miranda rights to terrorists overseas:

Seems the war on terror is starting to wear down those poor “insurgents”…

Al-Qaeda calls for donations of food, weapons

ISTANBUL — The leader of al-Qaeda in Afghanistan says militants are short of food, arms and other supplies needed to fight foreign forces there, a Web site linked to the group said.

“In Afghanistan, we have a severe supply deficit. The main reason for the weakness in operations is insufficient supplies. Many mujahideen sit and wait and cannot fight for lack of supplies,” Mustafa Abu al-Yazid said on a Web site used by top al-Qaeda leaders and other militants to post statements.

“If a mujahid (holy fighter) does not have the money to get weapons, food, drink and the materials for jihad, he cannot fight jihad,” Yazid said. “Fear Allah and be ambitious in waging jihad through [donating] goods.

Don’t miss Al-Qaeda’s weekend telethon, featuring “THE GUY FROM AL-QAEDA IN IRAQ”

Obama Visits Denny’s

June 9th, 2009 | 1 Comment | Posted in Obama

Obama Drastically Scales Back Goals For America After Visiting Denny’s:

The president was deeply unsettled by his visit to Denny’s – abandoning his plans for America now he’s met real Americans …

These guys get all the breaking news. I am still wondering what ever happened to Smitty’s.

Burning Your Mortgage Used To Be A Good Thing

June 9th, 2009 | No Comments | Posted in Economy

Tea Party

U.S. to allow 10 banks to repay TARP money: report

(Reuters) – The Treasury Department will allow 10 banks to pay back Troubled Asset Relief Program funds, Bloomberg said, citing people familiar with the matter.

JPMorgan Chase & Co is one of the banks, the news agency said, citing an anonymous source.

The Treasury did not immediately respond to a Reuters email, seeking comment on the report, that was sent outside normal business hours. The government conducted “stress tests” on the 19 largest U.S. banks to assess their exposure to risky real estate and other loans and to weigh how they might fare if economic conditions deteriorated. Nine banks were considered healthy enough that they did not need to add more capital, while the other 10 were told they needed to fatten their capital cushions by a combined $74.6 billion. The results of the tests were released in May. On Monday, the Federal Reserve said all 10 of the banks that were ordered to raise capital had come forward with plans that, if implemented, would raise the needed funds.

Which for some strange reason is against the wishes of the Obama administration.

Banks started railing against the TARP almost immediately after they accepted the help. CEO Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase & Co.  called the money a “scarlet letter,” referring to the public backlash and federal scrutiny that came with it.

Banks that are expected to get a green light to repay bailout funds include JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and American Express Co. They would be free of federal rules ranging from caps on executive pay to restrictions on dividend payments.

But weaker banks such as Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp. would remain tethered to the government and face a problem – how to compete for business and top workers against rivals operating more freely.

“Banks had been at an equal disadvantage,” said Jack A. Ablin, chief investment officer at Harris Private Bank in Chicago. “Now you’ll have some that are unfettered and others that are constrained. That will affect the ability to attract customers and talent.”

The government is set to announce as early as Tuesday morning which of the country’s biggest banks will be able to repay billions in federal bailout dollars in a decision that risks creating a two-tier banking system – winners and losers.

Congress approved the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program eight months ago as financial markets teetered on collapse. Almost ever since, banks have been eager to pay back bailout money and cut the federal strings that come with it.

Combined, the repayments could exceed $50 billion. Experts say that figure reflects a measure of stability that has returned to the banking system but caution that the crisis isn’t over. Some worry the repayments could widen the gap between healthy and weak banks.

Wonder who those are that worrying about the gap – it’s called free enterprise.

Leopard Beats Windows 7

June 8th, 2009 | No Comments | Posted in Tech Goodies

Apple’s SVP of Mac OS engineering, Craig Federighi, demos the Snow Leopard version of the operating system. For current Leopard users, the new OS–due in September–will be upgradable for $29.

Windows users can be happy that this may cause Microsoft to go easy on you for the Windows 7 upgrade – which if you are a Windows fan – is the best thing they’ve done since Windows 95.

Or, you can read about all the goodies Apple has in store for you now and make the switch.

Meet Bob Lutz – The Man That Could Have Saved GM

June 8th, 2009 | 3 Comments | Posted in Economy

Camaro

The only Ford I would ever consider buying is the Mustang. This is because Ford has yet to build a rival to the best car they ever built. Here’s an excerpt of a great article from the Washington Post on how the Volt (a car that can only go 40 miles and will cost $40K) came to be. And why it spells the end for GM.

Bob Lutz , an executive who probably is not long for Government Motors, gets it.

Bob was forced to introduce the Volt – not because he believes it’s what we want, but because it’s what the government and the environmentalists want. (Note that hybrid sales have plummeted.)

GM is ready with the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS with a V-8 engine.

With an estimated 25 miles per gallon on the highway, the 400-plus-horsepower Camaro SS is another Bob Lutz car, a monument to Lutz’s and GM’s enduring hope that even as the company struggles to escape bankruptcy as a smaller, leaner producer of fuel-efficient vehicles, the glory days can somehow be resurrected.

Sexy with charisma,” is how Lutz recently described the Camaro. “Some people don’t care for those kinds of descriptions today — it’s a different time,” says Lutz, who drives a gas-thirsty 2009 Corvette, a dream car of muscle lovers. “But we have new vehicles, too. We have the Volt. We are committed to the electrification of the automobile. We know this is the time.” (Sure.. job security.)

“In time, the government is going to legislate out of existence cars like the Camaro, the Corvette, the Cadillac CTS — all these acclaimed vehicles that have lately gotten rave reviews from the automotive press around the world,” he predicts. “So, ultimately, we are driven by legislation into the kind of excitement provided by the Volt.”

If you were to believe that Lutz commissioned the Volt because he thinks the environment needs to be saved from carbon dioxide emissions, or that the United States has a moral obligation to lead a greening of the planet, you would be wrong. “If you look at most of the mainstream media, you get the impression that 95 percent of Americans today want a vehicle like the Chevrolet Volt or a [hybrid such as the] Toyota Prius,” says Lutz. “And that, by God, the reason General Motors is in trouble, is that we have not offered a vehicle like that. But when you look at the reality, at today’s fuel prices, most Americans still want a conventional car.”

Why the Volt then? “Because it is an important symbol. We need it. It has a chance to change our image,” he says. (And Congress made them do it.)

As GM’s situation has become increasingly dire, and interested parties from President Obama to shareholders have demanded that the company start making more fuel-efficient cars, GM has pointed to the Volt as evidence of its changing ways. But the values that have long shaped this iconic company are deeply held, especially the passion for pushing the envelope of automobile performance and power. In many ways, the Volt, and GM’s subtle shift from old design priorities, represent a contradiction of those values.

“I just think GM is focusing on the wrong thing,” says Daniel Roos, an engineering professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who studies the automobile industry. “The quality of its cars was horrible in the ’70s and ’80s, but it’s much better now. It has world-class vehicles: the Malibu and the Cadillac CTS. They should be [promoting] those and capitalizing on their strengths.”

A car is not an appliance, he says. A car is not a washing machine — the proof of which is that people do not lust after their washing machines. They lust after a beautiful car, he says. If you want reliable, go get yourself a refrigerator. A gorgeous car, he says, is an expression of power and yearning, especially for owners who hope the vehicles will inject excitement and romance into their otherwise mundane lives. “Show me a washing machine that can do that,” he says.

Lutz saw that driving a Prius constituted nothing less than a values statement for many of its owners, a means to bask in the perception of their own enlightenment. Even more alarming, thought Lutz, was that some consumers not enamored of the Prius itself nonetheless saw its existence as proof of Toyota’s wisdom. The Prius’s presence alone was drawing people to Toyota lots, where the curious bought everything from bigger sedans to sport-utility vehicles and trucks with about the same gas mileage as their GM counterparts, groused Lutz. Part of what he called the “halo effect.”

No matter how we twist the numbers, we were going to lose a couple of hundred million dollars a year,” Lutz recalls. “And Rick Wagoner quite rightly, along with the finance people, said, ‘We can’t do that. We can’t go to the board of directors and come up with a program [for hybrids] costing the bigger portion of a billion dollars and when the board of directors [asks] why are we doing this, we say, ‘Well, we’re going to lose money on it, but, well, we’re doing it to show that General Motors is technologically advanced and environmentally aware.‘ You know, back then, that wasn’t going to receive a very warm welcome.”

Which brings us to today…

Nutball environmentalists are dead-serious about their silly global warming theories and feel a primal need to assuage their guilt and show others how self-righteous they are. It is all about pushing buyers’ buttons. His buttons, and those of a majority of Americans, are pushed by big, powerful cars and trucks, the essence of America on four wheels. But ignoring the nutballs cost them their company.

Capitalists don’t have the luxury of ignoring part of their potential customer base, because in a Capitalist society, you can be sure your competition will embrace them.

Too bad they didn’t get the Camero out earlier – it could have been the mini-van for GM.

What would you rather buy – The Camero or the instantly obsolete 40-mile Volt?

2010-Camaro

Not that it matters: The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 43% of current GM owners are not likely to buy another GM car, while 16% are not sure.

Democrats who own GM cars are somewhat more likely than others to buy their next car from GM…

It’s Clear Why Google Ignored D-Day

June 6th, 2009 | 3 Comments | Posted in Tech Goodies

Al Gore EarthE Money 'Slow'

…and chose lego to mark the anniversary. Check out the featured iGoogle Showcase of who they feel we should follow. Not sure they picked one conservative.

Now I see why Bing (Microsoft’s new search engine) has passed Yahoo and may catch up to Google someday.

Google needs to pay attention to why the newspapers are in a death spiral. You can’t offend 50+% of your audience and grow.

Gwyn Dyer On the Myth of Mad Mullahs.

June 6th, 2009 | 6 Comments | Posted in activists

IvyKingB1600c20

Gwyn asks: Why are Koreans so much braver than Israelis when faced with the threat of nuclear weapons? Why are Israelis almost hysterical about the Iranian threat, while South Koreans are phlegmatic about the North Korean threat?

It gets even weirder. Both Israel and South Korea have a security guarantee from the United States, which ultimately includes the backing of the U.S. nuclear deterrent. But South Korea has no nuclear weapons of its own and no ambitions of acquiring them, whereas Israel has hundreds of the things. In fact, it has enough nuclear weapons and delivery systems to destroy every Iranian city at the same time in a first strike.

Israelis are just as intelligent as Koreans, so there must be more going on here than meets the eye. Indeed, Israeli leaders know that Muslim leaders are not homicidal and suicidal maniacs (????) , even if the general public is encouraged to believe in the myth of “mad mullahs.” There has to be some genuine strategic distinction that explains the difference between the Israeli and the South Korean responses.

I am having a hard time following Gwyn on his comparison and downplaying of Iran - and the message seems to be aligned with the Iranian propaganda blitz.

Here’s a few reasons why Israel may be just a wee bit concerned:

- Ahmadinejad armed with nukes is about as close to Hitler and the Nazi killing camps as can be imagined. Also, Iran is run by a regime that openly arms, trains and funds insurgents responsible for killing Allied troops in Iraq and has American and British blood on its hands. Not to mention that the country is currently led by a genocidal maniac that rails against America at every opportunity.

- Kim and Ahmadinejad aren’t rational leaders. Ahmadinejad is a Twelver, a fanatical member of an Armageddon cult that believes the Twelfth Imam will return to earth after the destruction of the enemies of Islam — which means everybody on earth who isn’t one of them. That’s why even the Arabs next door are afraid of Iran’s nukes. Even though they are Muslims, they are the wrong kind, according to Ayatollah Khomeini, who founded the modern mullah state in Tehran.

- The North Koreans want attention and Kim Jong-il isn’t quite as crazy. North Korea sells nuclear and missile technology to Iran and Syria. It’s their only national export.

We know the Obama administration is full of  people in denial of clear and present dangers. Obama’s Chicago gang just told Israel not to defend itself. But the Israelis are a lot more morally serious about such things. It is simply not imaginable that they will allow the mad mullahs to have their own Armageddon weapon.

When Israel strikes out against its genocidal enemy the Obama gang may punish them. But Menachem Begin showed the morally serious decision to make in such a case: You defend your people first.

So what’s America’s response to Iran threatening to wipe an entire country off the face of the earth?

Hot dogs from the Obama administration, according to The New York Times…. The State Department has asked US embassies across the world to invite Iranian diplomats to 4th of July celebrations, for the first time in nearly 30 years.

Gwyn should take the time to stop by, grab a dog and have another talk with an Iranian diplomat. Ask them about the Twelfth Imam for me.

We Can Thank George Bush For This

June 6th, 2009 | No Comments | Posted in activists

viva colbert

Iraq is now becoming safe enough for American TV…

Colbert to broadcast 4 shows from Baghdad

NEW YORK – Stephen Colbert will broadcast four shows next week from Baghdad, where he says he’ll be “Bob Hoping” it for the troops.

Colbert arrived at the former Al Faw Palace at Camp Victory on Friday.

For weeks, he’s promoted the trip on Comedy Central’s “The Colbert Report,” but because the military urged caution, he has only trumpeted a vague trip to “the Persian Gulf.” The series of shows, each to be taped in front of an audience of about 450 troops, have been dubbed “Operation Iraqi Stephen: Going Commando.”

It’s the first time anyone has broadcast from Iraq for a USO tour. Though Colbert has often infused his mock pundit character into real events — the 2008 election, the 2006 White House Correspondents’ Association dinner — his Iraq trip isn’t a parody. Both the character Colbert (silent “t”) and the real Colbert (pronounced “t”), a Catholic family man, are ardent supporters of the troops. He has raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for the Yellow Ribbon Fund (a charity that assists injured service members and their families), and he’s a board member of DonorsChoose.org, which is raising money for the education of children of parents in the military.

OnProbation.ca – Miserable Failure

June 6th, 2009 | 2 Comments | Posted in Canada Election

Here’s a look inside the Liberal party’s great website that was created to keep track of the Conservatives while they were on Iggy’s imposed probation …

Working with you to keep the government on track

We deserve transparency and accountability from our government so that we can address this economic crisis responsibly and plan for our recovery. Canadians want the facts. That’s why we’ve built this site. You can help us keep the government on track.

So far the site has been a roaring success

Since

- Share Your Story - (No stories)

In this time of crisis, Canadians need transparency and accountability from their government. But with record high unemployment and job losses, they refuse to cooperate. That’s why we’ve built this site.

You can help us. Share your story. Write to the PM. Contribute. Connect. We need to make sure they’re listening.

- They have twitter:

following 544, Followed by 331.

In twitter terms this rates as absolutely dismal. Of note is that the CBC is one of their early followers. Iggy’s twitter is doing better, but with only 8,177 followers he’s an amateur. It’s almost as exciting as Politwitter

- Facebook:

430 members. Even my niece has more. The site is run by:

Great job guys.

- Alexa Stats:

Bounce rate (users that come and the leave immediately) – 7 day average 100%

Traffic Rank: 1,942,953 (#1 is the highest – this site rates with an typical abandoned website)

Referring sites:
62.50% liberal.ca
37.50% twitter.com (see twitter stats above)

Incoming links (measures a sites popularity) 108

The site probably took $10-$20,000 to build (or $60-$100,000 to a Liberal party friend), doesn’t get the basics of SEO, and if it were mine, I’d fire whoever is behind the marketing of it.

- Interactive job losses around the country map: not sure what the point of his page is.

Last week Statistics Canada reported another 61,000 net job losses in March, pushing the national unemployment rate to 8 per cent, the highest we’ve seen in seven years. Since peaking in October 2008, employment has fallen each month, putting 357,000 Canadians out of work. We’ve launched this interactive map to help illustrate this, and to help track job losses across the country since the election. You can help.

No update on the copy since March… and exactly how can I help?

- My favorite is Ask The Prime Minister.

you actually can’t ask a question and they have populated the page with questions any smart Liberal should be asking… and you vote for the top ones. Oh, you get to vote three times.  Combined votes approx 4,000.

3 votes left! What happens if I run out? (the link doesn’t work – found hidden in the code: You can change your votes by clicking on them)

How can you help this miserable site?

Have a good idea for the web site? We want to hear about it.

Send us your data, graphs or articles and after we fact-check all the materials, we’ll see how we can integrate your ideas. One thing we do ask is that you include sources for all your data.

If you prefer to reach us by email, you can find us at info@onprobation.ca. This is also a good idea if you’d like to submit several different types of files. While we may not be able to respond to every message we receive, we do promise to read each and every one.

Unfortunately, all of the ideas submitted so far haven’t been deemed good enough to get shown.

This initiative was Iggy’s way of showing his leadership potential as the leader of the opposition. If this is any gauge of the Liberal Party’s ‘net savvy… nothing to worry about here.