<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Suzuki Fails Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesecretsofvancouver.com/wordpress/david-suzuki-fails-again/canada-election/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesecretsofvancouver.com/wordpress/david-suzuki-fails-again/canada-election</link>
	<description>“Where Just Being &#039;Right&#039; Is Wrong&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://thesecretsofvancouver.com/wordpress/david-suzuki-fails-again/canada-election/comment-page-1#comment-2450</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 05:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesecretsofvancouver.com/wordpress/?p=5517#comment-2450</guid>
		<description>First past the post has been around for hundreds of years and has worked extremely well. There is ZERO reason to change this system and not 1 STV yes man has ever come up with a good reason why this is necessary. The pro STV minority can go and form their own country. I must warn you STV proponents though that you&#039;ll probably have to do it violently. The bumper sticker thing doesn&#039;t really work as we&#039;ve seen with Tibet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First past the post has been around for hundreds of years and has worked extremely well. There is ZERO reason to change this system and not 1 STV yes man has ever come up with a good reason why this is necessary. The pro STV minority can go and form their own country. I must warn you STV proponents though that you&#8217;ll probably have to do it violently. The bumper sticker thing doesn&#8217;t really work as we&#8217;ve seen with Tibet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skinny Dipper</title>
		<link>http://thesecretsofvancouver.com/wordpress/david-suzuki-fails-again/canada-election/comment-page-1#comment-2448</link>
		<dc:creator>Skinny Dipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 01:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesecretsofvancouver.com/wordpress/?p=5517#comment-2448</guid>
		<description>I think you were against STV all along.  You just needed an excuse to oppose it.  David Suzuk was that excuse for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you were against STV all along.  You just needed an excuse to oppose it.  David Suzuk was that excuse for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubba Brown</title>
		<link>http://thesecretsofvancouver.com/wordpress/david-suzuki-fails-again/canada-election/comment-page-1#comment-2446</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 21:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesecretsofvancouver.com/wordpress/?p=5517#comment-2446</guid>
		<description>Yeesss indeed if weird beard kooky is for it I am agin it!I think S T V is an acronym for &quot;screw the voter&quot; I think the best example is Lizzy Mae being graciously allowed a seat at the debate and using it to showcase her shrieking childish behavior towards any one who did not agree with her fantasy about globull-warming.
Cheers Bubba</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeesss indeed if weird beard kooky is for it I am agin it!I think S T V is an acronym for &#8220;screw the voter&#8221; I think the best example is Lizzy Mae being graciously allowed a seat at the debate and using it to showcase her shrieking childish behavior towards any one who did not agree with her fantasy about globull-warming.<br />
Cheers Bubba</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fernstalbert</title>
		<link>http://thesecretsofvancouver.com/wordpress/david-suzuki-fails-again/canada-election/comment-page-1#comment-2445</link>
		<dc:creator>fernstalbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesecretsofvancouver.com/wordpress/?p=5517#comment-2445</guid>
		<description>If David Suzuki is for STV (looks suspiciously like STD), I would be against it just on principle.  One person, one vote - monogamous relationship with one party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If David Suzuki is for STV (looks suspiciously like STD), I would be against it just on principle.  One person, one vote &#8211; monogamous relationship with one party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Durward</title>
		<link>http://thesecretsofvancouver.com/wordpress/david-suzuki-fails-again/canada-election/comment-page-1#comment-2444</link>
		<dc:creator>Durward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesecretsofvancouver.com/wordpress/?p=5517#comment-2444</guid>
		<description>The idea of democracy is to represent the majority of it&#039;s citizens which enables government to move forward with governing in a stable fashion.you can&#039;t please everyone ever, but democracy ensures you please the majority or your gone. It&#039;s fair.
STV would be to represent everyone and no-one while creating short term ineffectual government, it is anti-democratic and fully bureaucratic in nature, a purely socialist scam to steal more from the productive and distribute it to the non-productive parts of society which can be counted on to vote for any free lunch on my dollar. Who would we get? who would they supposedly represent? it&#039;s not fair only costly and harmful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of democracy is to represent the majority of it&#8217;s citizens which enables government to move forward with governing in a stable fashion.you can&#8217;t please everyone ever, but democracy ensures you please the majority or your gone. It&#8217;s fair.<br />
STV would be to represent everyone and no-one while creating short term ineffectual government, it is anti-democratic and fully bureaucratic in nature, a purely socialist scam to steal more from the productive and distribute it to the non-productive parts of society which can be counted on to vote for any free lunch on my dollar. Who would we get? who would they supposedly represent? it&#8217;s not fair only costly and harmful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

